Postmodern films

18 11 2010

Discuss two or more films that you would define as ‘postmodern’ and explain why you would give them this label.

Two of the films I would describe as ‘postmodern’ would be A Cock and Bull Story and Pulp Fiction. This is largely down to the way they don’t follow a narrative, and keep reminding you what you’re watching, is a film.
A Cock and Bull Story starts with the lead characters, Coogan and Brydon, as actors, talking in their dressing room. As soon as a film start, you are told what you are watching is a construction and is fiction. This scene is particularly pointless, as they are just joking around, and this doesn’t contribute to the plot at all. The scene moves to the ‘actual’ movie with Coogan walking towards the camera as his character Tristram Shandy. This scene is postmodern as it uses music composed in the 1980’s, for an 18th century scene. It sounds like music composed in that time, but it feels like almost a mockery. The voiceover ‘the trouble with writing a book about yourself is that you can’t fool around. Why not?’ Much of the film is ‘fooling around’ as nothing really happens, and it refuses to have a beginning, middle and an end, it fools around with the narrative. In these few scenes Tristram is talking directly to the audience, this is quite postmodern as Tristram is acknowledging the fact he is in a film.
In A Cock and Bull Story, there are some scenes in the first few that really remind the audience that what they are watching is a film, or just confuse them. For example, Tristam mentions Pavlov’s dogs, which didn’t happen until the 1890’s, and this is a film set in the 18th century, so it doesn’t really make any sense, so it confuses the audience. It also has a fake clip of Pavlov performing his experiment, which is a form of bricolage. Pulp fiction also does a similar thing to being in a different time. This is shown in the Jack Rabbit Slims scene. The characters, Mia Wallace and Vincent Vega go to a 50’s style nostalgia café, and they seem to change when they get there. Vincent’s car is a Chevy, which also seems like it’s from the 50’s. Vincent’s outfit, however, is like a sort of cowboy outfit, so he seems like he’s in the wrong movie. This could be a reference to what people felt like when he was going to be in the movie, Travolta was more typical of movies like Grease and Saturday Night Fever so to be a gangster in a movie seemed quite weird. Mia then makes a rectangle with her hands, and this pulls the audience out of the film, and reminds them that they’re watching a film.
When they step into the restaurant, the camera follows just behind Vincent as he wanders aimlessly through it. This is a link to his altered state from taking the heroine. This aimlessness is typical of postmodern films, as it doesn’t add anything to the plot. Everything in the restaurant is a ‘copy of a copy’, and as Vincent describes it as a ‘wax museum with a pulse’, what we see is a version, of a version. It’s a second level of representation. Everything seems false, but it very much supposed to so this confuses the audience in what this scene is about. When Vincent and Mia engage in conversation, this also seems very pointless, it just a stream of pop-culture and movie reference, and just aimless conversation, and again, this doesn’t add to the plot in any way. Vincent just goes round in circles when he asks about what happened to Tony Rocky Horror, saying ‘one way of looking at it is…. Another way of looking at it is…’, so this just feels like a waste of time.

In A Cock and Bull Story, Tristram keeps says ‘I am getting ahead of myself, I am not yet born’ when the plot seems to be developing in some way. The narrative of the film is played around with constantly, and keeps going back in time as the plot tries to advance. Although the audience thinks he is born, and can hear him talking to them, they are then being told that he isn’t born, so this is very postmodern as it refers to the fact that the movie is just a story. This happens again when a child actor is playing Tristram at a younger age. In this scene Tristram says to the audience ‘That is a child actor pretending to be me….he’s unable to convey the pain or shock of such an event’. Tristram is calling someone who is playing him and actor, when he is in fact, also an actor. The child actor stops screaming from the pain, to retaliate at Tristram, and he shows how he would of done the scene. This is very confusing as Tristram, although he refers to the child as being an actor, playing himself; he isn’t even ‘himself’. In the scenes of Tristram’s past to him, everything is real, for example he refers to his mother giving birth to him as ‘This is my beautiful, lovely mother, Elizabeth’. Everything is real, except himself in the past, who is always an actor, so this combination of people who are to him ‘real’ and actors really show how this is just a film.
Pulp Fiction also doesn’t follow a set narrative, it is split into several ‘stories’ which overlap each other in time, and have a little amount of reference to each other. We have to wait to the end of the film to see the end of the first story. But after the first story we see the same character ‘Vince’ in the future, taking out Mia Wallace, which is what he was talking about, most of the way through the first story. Also, before the end of the film, we see Vincent die, which makes it quite confusing seeing him at the end of the move. This also makes the audience not really care what happens to him in the last ‘story’ as we know he’s going to die.
Before Tristram s born, in A Cock and Bull Story, the narrative literally is ‘cut’ by the director. As the audience where getting into the plot, it ends, and we are instead watching the actors behind the scenes, however, a new narrative starts as the relationships of the actors, who are playing themselves.
In Conclusion, Both films have strong uses of confusions of time and space, as they don’t follow a set narrative, and seem to just go around in circles, instead of advancing any way in the plot. A Cock and Bull Story is also almost a pastiche of period drama’s, as it mocks the way they are put together.





lotr and propp

12 10 2010

Proof i did it on the 4th of october:
Christopher Brooker’s analysis of the 8 types of plot is reference to Lord of the Rings

Not 100% where i put it last time, so i’ll put it up again.

Lord of the Rings would fit under Overcoming the Monster where a hero must defeat a monster and restore order to a world that has been threatened by the monster’s presence.
The hero here would be Frodo, as he is the one who is given the ‘quest’ and has to undergo perils in order to ‘save the day’. The Monster here would be Sauron, who has threatened the world by his presence. Frodo is accompanied by Sam, who acts as the role of a sidekick, never being the hero, but always saving and helping him. However, there is more than one hero to Lord of the Rings, as it spans over three linked stories, but these heroes are more sidekicks, as they never go directly to defeat the monster, more to help the main hero, Frodo. At the end, Frodo has defeated the monster and has restored his home to the way it was, and this fits right in with ‘the monster’ plot.
One of these would be Aragon, as he protects Frodo, but also has his own quest to win the girl. His ‘quest’ could fall under the other category of The Quest. This is where a hero often accompanied by sidekicks (Gimli and Legolas), travels in search of a priceless treasure and fights against evil and overpowering odds, and ends when he gets both the treasure and the girl. The Odyssey is a classic example of this kind of story. His treasure would be becoming the king, as it was his right, and he ends up with both that, and the woman.
Gandalf would be another hero, as he also is going to defeat another ‘monster’ Saroman, who also threatens the world, but is working with the ‘main’ monster, Sauron.
Because Lord of the Rings is such a long story (and fits into 3 different movies and books), it can span more than plot. Each book, or movie, focuses more on a different persons plot.





audience theory and trailers

4 10 2010

Exam section one
You need to be able to discuss theory in relation to:
Narratice
Audience
Genre
Representation
Media language

Uses and gratification theory
The emphasis in this theory is on how audiences use texts and why they consume texts in the first place. Instead pf thinking about audiences to passive recipients of information, it is revealin to think how/why people consume media text

Who is it associated with?
Katz

How would we apply this to trailers?
-increasingly, audiences actively seek out trailers. They don’t just consume them passively, but actively pursue them.
- to help us make choices about seeing film
- to get an understanding/ prepare yourself for the film
- as a form of entertainment / distraction

Two step flow theory
The two step model can be usefully be applied to railers. Audiences are sometimes directly affected by trailers but equally can be influenced by the opinions of others whose ideas they respect one person can see a trailer and enthuse other about it.





Christopher Booker – has recently published a book called The Seven Basic Plots. What are they?

27 09 2010

1) Overcoming the Monster — Stories like Beowulf, ‘Little Red Riding Hood’, Jaws, and many of the James Bond films, where a hero must defeat a monster and restore order to a world that has been threatened by the monster’s presence.
(2) Rags to Riches — These stories feature modest, generally virtuous but downtrodden characters, who achieve a happy ending when their special talents or true beauty is revealed to the world at large. Includes any number of classics such as ‘Cinderella’, David Copperfield, and the Horatio Alger novels.
(3) The Quest — A hero, often accompanied by sidekicks, travels in search of a priceless treasure and fights against evil and overpowering odds, and ends when he gets both the treasure and the girl. The Odyssey is a classic example of this kind of story.
(4) Voyage and Return — Alice in Wonderland, Robinson Crusoe on his desert island, other stories of normal protagonists who are suddenly thrust into strange and alien worlds and must make their way back to normal life once more.
(5) Comedy — Not always synonymous with humour. Instead, the plot of a comedy involves some kind of confusion that must be resolved before the hero and heroine can be united in love. Think of Shakespeare’s comedies, The Marriage of Figaro, the plays of Oscar Wilde and Gilbert and Sullivan, and even War and Peace.
(6) Tragedy — As a rule, the terrible consequences of human overreaching and egotism. The Picture of Dorian Gray, Julius Caesar, Anna Karenina…this category is usually self-evident.
(7) Rebirth — The stories of Ebeneezer Scrooge and Mary Lennox would fall into this basic plot type, which focuses on a threatening shadow that seems nearly victorious until a sequence of fortuitous (or even miraculous) events lead to redemption and rebirth, and the restoration of a happier world.

http://tobedwithatrollope.wordpress.com/2007/12/11/the-seven-basic-plots-wh-we-tell-stories-by-christopher-booker/





Can you find out how Will Wright has applied Proppean analysis to Westerns in Six Guns and Society.

27 09 2010

Functions in the classical plot as presented by Wright (41-48):

(1) The hero enters a social group.

(2) The hero is unknown to the society.

(3) The hero is revealed to have an exceptional ability.

(4) The society recognizes a difference between themselves and the hero; the hero is given a special status.

(5) The society does not completely accept the hero.

(6) There is a conflict of interests between the villains and the society.

(7) The villains are stronger than the society; the society is weak.

(8) There is a strong friendship or respect between the hero and a villain.

(9) The villains threaten the society.

(10) The hero avoids involvement in the conflict.

(11) The villains endanger a friend of the hero.

(12) The hero fights the villains.

(13) The hero defeats the villains.

(14) The society is safe.

(15) The society accepts the hero.

(16) The hero loses or gives up his special status.

Wright (at 64-69) lays out the functions of the classical Western hero plot in the form of structural propositions:

(1) The hero is or was a member of society.

(2) The villains do harm to the hero and to the society.

(3) The society is unable to punish the villains.

(4) The hero seeks vengeance.

(5) The hero goes outside of society.

(6) The hero is revealed to have a special ability.

(7) The society recognizes a difference between themselves and the hero: the hero is given a special status.

(8) A representative of society asks the hero to give up his revenge.

(9) The hero gives up his revenge

(10) The hero fights the villains.

(11) The hero defeats the villains.

(12) The hero gives up his special status.

(13) The hero enters society.

More on: http://myweb.wvnet.edu/~jelkins/film04/wright.html





Propp’s mythology of the folk tales – 1928

27 09 2010

The narrative has 31 functions according to Propp:

  1. ABSENTATION: A member of a family leaves the security of the home environment. This may be the hero or some other member of the family that the hero will later need to rescue. This division of the cohesive family injects initial tension into the storyline. The hero may also be introduced here, often being shown as an ordinary person.
  2. INTERDICTION: An interdiction is addressed to the hero (‘don’t go there’, ‘don’t do this’). The hero is warned against some action (given an ‘interdiction’).
  3. VIOLATION of INTERDICTION. The interdiction is violated (villain enters the tale). This generally proves to be a bad move and the villain enters the story, although not necessarily confronting the hero. Perhaps they are just a lurking presence or perhaps they attack the family whilst the hero is away.
  4. RECONNAISSANCE: The villain makes an attempt at reconnaissance (either villain tries to find the children/jewels etc.; or intended victim questions the villain). The villain (often in disguise) makes an active attempt at seeking information, for example searching for something valuable or trying to actively capture someone. They may speak with a member of the family who innocently divulges information. They may also seek to meet the hero, perhaps knowing already the hero is special in some way.
  5. DELIVERY: The villain gains information about the victim. The villain’s seeking now pays off and he or she now acquires some form of information, often about the hero or victim. Other information can be gained, for example about a map or treasure location.
  6. TRICKERY: The villain attempts to deceive the victim to take possession of victim or victim’s belongings (trickery; villain disguised, tries to win confidence of victim). The villain now presses further, often using the information gained in seeking to deceive the hero or victim in some way, perhaps appearing in disguise. This may include capture of the victim, getting the hero to give the villain something or persuading them that the villain is actually a friend and thereby gaining collaboration.
  7. COMPLICITY: Victim taken in by deception, unwittingly helping the enemy. The trickery of the villain now works and the hero or victim naively acts in a way that helps the villain. This may range from providing the villain with something (perhaps a map or magical weapon) to actively working against good people (perhaps the villain has persuaded the hero that these other people are actually bad).
  8. VILLAINY or LACK: Villain causes harm/injury to family member (by abduction, theft of magical agent, spoiling crops, plunders in other forms, causes a disappearance, expels someone, casts spell on someone, substitutes child etc., comits murder, imprisons/detains someone, threatens forced marriage, provides nightly torments); Alternatively, a member of family lacks something or desires something (magical potion etc.). There are two options for this function, either or both of which may appear in the story. In the first option, the villain causes some kind of harm, for example carrying away a victim or the desired magical object (which must be then be retrieved). In the second option, a sense of lack is identified, for example in the hero’s family or within a community, whereby something is identified as lost or something becomes desirable for some reason, for example a magical object that will save people in some way.
  9. MEDIATION: Misfortune or lack is made known, (hero is dispatched, hears call for help etc./ alternative is that victimized hero is sent away, freed from imprisonment). The hero now discovers the act of villainy or lack, perhaps finding their family or community devastated or caught up in a state of anguish and woe.
  10. BEGINNING COUNTER-ACTION: Seeker agrees to, or decides upon counter-action. The hero now decides to act in a way that will resolve the lack, for example finding a needed magical item, rescuing those who are captured or otherwise defeating the villain. This is a defining moment for the hero as this is the decision that sets the course of future actions and by which a previously ordinary person takes on the mantle of heroism.
  11. DEPARTURE: Hero leaves home;
  12. FIRST FUNCTION OF THE DONOR: Hero is tested, interrogated, attacked etc., preparing the way for his/her receiving magical agent or helper (donor);
  13. HERO’S REACTION: Hero reacts to actions of future donor (withstands/fails the test, frees captive, reconciles disputants, performs service, uses adversary’s powers against him);
  14. RECEIPT OF A MAGICAL AGENT: Hero acquires use of a magical agent (directly transferred, located, purchased, prepared, spontaneously appears, eaten/drunk, help offered by other characters);
  15. GUIDANCE: Hero is transferred, delivered or led to whereabouts of an object of the search;
  16. STRUGGLE: Hero and villain join in direct combat;
  17. BRANDING: Hero is branded (wounded/marked, receives ring or scarf);
  18. VICTORY: Villain is defeated (killed in combat, defeated in contest, killed while asleep, banished);
  19. LIQUIDATION: Initial misfortune or lack is resolved (object of search distributed, spell broken, slain person revived, captive freed);
  20. RETURN: Hero returns;
  21. PURSUIT: Hero is pursued (pursuer tries to kill, eat, undermine the hero);
  22. RESCUE: Hero is rescued from pursuit (obstacles delay pursuer, hero hides or is hidden, hero transforms unrecognisably, hero saved from attempt on his/her life);
  23. UNRECOGNIZED ARRIVAL: Hero unrecognized, arrives home or in another country;
  24. UNFOUNDED CLAIMS: False hero presents unfounded claims;
  25. DIFFICULT TASK: Difficult task proposed to the hero (trial by ordeal, riddles, test of strength/endurance, other tasks);
  26. SOLUTION: Task is resolved;
  27. RECOGNITION: Hero is recognized (by mark, brand, or thing given to him/her);
  28. EXPOSURE: False hero or villain is exposed;
  29. TRANSFIGURATION: Hero is given a new appearance (is made whole, handsome, new garments etc.);
  30. PUNISHMENT: Villain is punished;
  31. WEDDING: Hero marries and ascends the throne (is rewarded/promoted).

http://www.answers.com/topic/vladimir-propp

He also concluded that all the characters could be resolved into 8 broad character types in the 100 tales he analyzed:

  1. The villain — struggles against the hero.
  2. The donor — prepares the hero or gives the hero some magical object.
  3. The (magical) helper — helps the hero in the quest.
  4. The princess or prize — the hero deserves her throughout the story but is unable to marry her because of an unfair evil, usually because of the villain. the hero’s journey is often ended when he marries the princess, thereby beating the villain.
  5. her father — gives the task to the hero, identifies the false hero, marries the hero, often sought for during the narrative. Propp noted that functionally, the princess and the father can not be clearly distinguished.
  6. The dispatcher — character who makes the lack known and sends the hero off.
  7. The hero or victim/seeker hero — reacts to the donor, weds the princess.
  8. False hero — takes credit for the hero’s actions or tries to marry the princess.[5]

These roles could sometimes be distributed among various characters, as the hero kills the villain dragon, and the dragon’s sisters take on the villainous role of chasing him. Conversely, one character could engage in acts as more than one role, as a father could send his son on the quest and give him a sword, acting as both dispatcher and donor.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Propp








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.